Acclaimed world cinema hit, Tsotsi is an adaptation of a novel  set in Johannesberg. It tracks the redemption of its central character, Tsotsi, a mean criminal who is widely feared in his area of town. Forced to live in a shanty town after the death of his mother to AIDS the work looks both at Tsotsi's own life and his criminal activities before exploring his own desire to change when, after a bungled car jacking he finds himself in charge of a young baby.

Tsotsi was submitted for classification in November 2005. The defining classification issues in this work were strong language and violence, although other issues discussed included the work's theme, some nudity, animal cruelty and drug use.

Examiners noted over 30 uses of 'fuck' and its derivatives, mostly subtitled. Such levels of strong language pushed the work beyond the boundaries of '12A' where strong language must be infrequent. In addition examiners noted mild language such as 'bastard'.

The violence is not detailed but examiners noted the tone and impression it created being both strong and impactful in three key scenes. The calculated stabbing of a commuter in the opening scene is shocking, not least in its expression of the ruthlessness of Tsotsi's gang, and the particular sociopathic attitudes of his friend Butcher.

The scene where Tsotsi beats his friend and fellow gang member, Boston, was also discussed, with examiners stating in their reports that, despite a lack of process detail, the scene has a strong impact, particularly when the audience sees Boston's bloodied face afterwards. Later in the film there are some shots of the character's face which remains misshapen and swollen with one eye permanently closed. However, as there was  no  dwelling or focus on the infliction or pain and injury this was not a problem given the '15' recommendation.

In addition the work has two shootings, one of which is shown with some blood detail. When Tsotsi shoots Boston the shooting itself happens offscreen. The audience sees blood spatters on another character's face and later the victim's body on the ground, with some blood forming a pool underneath him.

Though the violence is strong, and noted in the film's Consumer Advice, it lacks the sustained focus on process detail, or the sadistic infliction of pain and injury which would have placed the work at ‘18’. An example of a film which was rated '18' for very strong violence and injury detail was The Passion Of The Christ.

Other issues which were not noted in the consumer advice but were discussed  included drug use, nudity and Animal Cruelty.

The drug use includes sight of the smoking of marijuana joints. There was no imitable detail or glamorisation of the activity so it did not affect the classification. Similarly the nudity was natural (including the sight of a woman's breast as she breastfeeds her baby) and posed no problem at the recommended category.

Finally the animal cruelty was entirely impressionistic. Approximately 40 minutes into the work there are offscreen sounds suggesting a dog being beaten by Tsotsi's father, followed by offscreen whining and then sight of the dog struggling along on the ground. As there is no sight of real animal cruelty and given that the dog could have easily been trained to walk slowly examiners, recommended that no intervention was necessary.

The film was passed ‘15’ with no cuts. It was also passed ‘15’ for its video release.

Case Study: The Passion Of The Christ

<Back